Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

  • Home
  • People
  • Practice Areas
    • International Trade
    • International Investment and Project Development
    • International Disputes/Rights & Obligations of Sovereign States & Autonomous Regions
    • U.S. & International Regulation and Legislation
    • Board Advisory Work
  • Global Experience
  • News/Blog
  • Contact Us

August 10, 2015 by Nathaniel Rickard

U.S. Department of Justice Files Two Civil Suits Alleging Fraudulent Evasion of over $40 Million in Antidumping Duties

The U.S. Department of Justice (Justice) recently filed two different civil suits at the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) seeking to recover millions of dollars in antidumping duties alleged to have been fraudulently evaded. In both cases, Justice alleges a pattern of activities undertaken by importers designed to undermine the effectiveness of antidumping duty […]

Filed Under: International Trade Tagged With: antidumping, enforcement, import fraud, International Trade

July 6, 2015 by Nathaniel Rickard

Court of International Trade Rejects CBP’s Bond Sufficiency Determinations for Certain Entries of Magnesia Carbon Bricks

Domestic industries considering whether to utilize the trade remedy laws must confront an essential question up front: even if the petition results in the imposition of a trade remedy, will the measure be enforceable? Although enforcement risks differ substantially depending on product, the use of fraud to evade and circumvent antidumping duty and/or countervailing duty […]

Filed Under: Customs, International Trade Tagged With: antidumping, CBP, China, countervailing duty, import fraud, International Trade, surety, Vietnam

June 17, 2015 by Nathaniel Rickard

Court of International Trade Upholds Single Transaction Bond Requirement on Imports of Garlic from China

The U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) has upheld a negative bond sufficiency determination by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) regarding certain entries of fresh garlic from China imported by Kwo Lee Inc. The fresh garlic was exported by Qingdao Tiantaixing Foods Co., Ltd. (“QTF”), a company that had obtained an antidumping duty cash […]

Filed Under: Customs, International Trade Tagged With: antidumping, CBP, garlic trade, import fraud, International Trade

February 23, 2015 by PKR

PKR Attorneys Publish in George Mason Journal of International Commercial Law

PKR Attorneys Jordan Kahn and Nathaniel Rickard have published an article in the most recent volume of the George Mason Journal of International Commercial Law entitled “Commerce Must Adopt A Central Role in Addressing Circumvention of All Types.” This article describes the alarming uptick in circumvention of antidumping and countervailing duty laws, as well as the respective […]

Filed Under: International Trade, News Tagged With: antidumping, CBP, China, CIT, countervailing duty, import fraud, International Trade, seafood trade, tissue paper trade

December 16, 2014 by PKR

Kahn Publishes in Georgetown Journal of International Law

PKR attorney Jordan Kahn has published an article in the most recent volume of the Georgetown Journal of International Law, entitled “2013 in Review: CIT Opinions Resolving Challenges to Commerce AD/CVD Decisions on Products Imported from NMEs.” The article is available at: http://www.law.georgetown.edu/academics/law-journals/gjil/recent/upload/zsx00115000057.PDF

Filed Under: International Trade, News Tagged With: antidumping, CAFC, China, CIT, countervailing duty, import fraud, International Trade, nonmarket economy, Vietnam

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 9
  • Next Page »

Contact

Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP
1750 K Street NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: +1 202 331 4040
Fax: +1 202 331 4011
info@pkrllp.com

Recent Posts

  • Zachary J. Walker and Sophia Lin Named Counsel
  • Non-Resident Importers and Inadequate Bonding Leave Duties Unpaid, Harming the Public Fisc

Sitemap

PKR LLP Sitemap

© Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

The materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. If you have a particular problem or issue for which you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.