Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

  • People
  • Practice Areas
    • International Trade
    • International Investment and Project Development
    • International Disputes/Rights & Obligations of Sovereign States & Autonomous Regions
    • U.S. & International Regulation and Legislation
    • Board Advisory Work
    • Public Interest and Charitable Activities
  • Global Experience
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

May 8, 2013 by PKR

Comment: Understanding Circumvention of Antidumping Duties

A plea agreement filed in a federal court in the Northern District of Illinois on May 3 described an intricate scheme that evaded the payment of nearly $39 million in duties on imports of honey from China.  In the agreement, Hung Yi Lin a/k/a Katy Lin admits to using the freight forwarding company Ms. Lin owned and […]

Filed Under: Customs, Customs, International Trade Tagged With: antidumping, CBP, China, honey trade, import fraud, International Trade

May 3, 2013 by PKR

CIT Affirms Commerce Circumvention Determination

This week, the Court of International Trade released the public version of its decision Max Fortune Industrial Co. v. United States.  In 2011, the Department of Commerce determined that Max Fortune had circumvented the antidumping duty order on tissue paper products from China.  At the request of a domestic paper company, Commerce had in 2010 […]

Filed Under: International Trade Tagged With: antidumping, CBP, China, CIT, import fraud, International Trade, tissue paper trade, Vietnam

March 25, 2013 by PKR

Kahn Publishes Article in Global Trade and Customs Journal

PKR attorney Jordan Kahn published an article in the April 2013 Global Trade and Customs Journal entitled “Commerce’s Commitment to Strengthening US Trade Remedy Laws. “The article describes PKR’s recent litigation achievements on behalf of the Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee before the Court of International Trade and Department of Commerce.

Filed Under: International Trade, News Tagged With: antidumping, Bangladesh, CAFC, Cambodia, CBP, China, CIT, countervailing duty, enforcement, import fraud, India, International Trade, labor, nonmarket economy, seafood trade, Thailand, Vietnam

January 14, 2013 by David Yocis

CIT Rules in Enforcement Action on Softwood Lumber Agreement

In opinions issued in December 2012 (cit.uscourts.gov/SlipOpinions) and January 2013 (cit.uscourts.gov/SlipOpinions), the Court of International Trade issued important rulings in an action brought to enforce the 1996 Softwood Lumber Agreement.  Even though the 1996 SLA expired in 2001, these decisions have continuing relevance for the current SLA, which entered into force in 2006. First, some […]

Filed Under: Customs, International Trade Tagged With: Canada, CBP, CIT, enforcement, lumber, SLA

August 24, 2011 by PKR

Court of International Trade Remands Antidumping Duty Review of Chinese Shrimp

The Court of International Trade today issued a remand for the Commerce Department to revisit its selection of the Chinese companies used to set the antidumping duty rates in the fourth administrative review of that order. Picard Kentz & Rowe brought the case on behalf of the Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee (“AHSTAC”), an association of […]

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: antidumping, CBP, China, CIT, import fraud, nonmarket economy, seafood trade

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Next Page »

Contact

Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP
1750 K Street NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: +1 202 331 4040
Fax: +1 202 331 4011
info@pkrllp.com

Recent Posts

  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection Reports Record Amounts of Imports Subject to Antidumping and Countervailing Duties in FY2021
  • Number of U.S. Industries Filing Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions Decreases Significantly in Fiscal Year 2021

Sitemap

PKR LLP Sitemap

© Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

The materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. If you have a particular problem or issue for which you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.