Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

  • Home
  • People
  • Practice Areas
    • International Trade
    • International Investment and Project Development
    • International Disputes/Rights & Obligations of Sovereign States & Autonomous Regions
    • U.S. & International Regulation and Legislation
    • Board Advisory Work
  • Global Experience
  • News/Blog
  • Contact Us

July 24, 2013 by PKR

CIT Affirms Commerce’s Application of AFA to Chinese Shrimp Exporter

The Court of International Trade yesterday issued an opinion in a challenge to the final results of the 2009-10 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on shrimp from China.  The appeal was brought in 2010 by an association of domestic shrimp producers, the Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee (AHSTAC). Through PKR, AHSTAC successfully challenged […]

Filed Under: International Law, International Trade, News Tagged With: antidumping, Cambodia, China, CIT, import fraud, India, International Trade, nonmarket economy, seafood trade

July 22, 2013 by PKR

Commerce Authorized to Consider Evidence Regarding Circumvention

The Court of International Trade Friday issued an order authorizing the government to reopen the 2008-09 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on shrimp from China that was concluded in 2010.  The Commerce Department now will consider evidence made public in 2012 suggesting transshipment through Cambodia to evade antidumping duties.  This evidence, from a criminal […]

Filed Under: International Law, International Trade, News Tagged With: antidumping, CAFC, Cambodia, China, CIT, import fraud, International Trade, seafood trade

May 28, 2013 by PKR

Federal Circuit Authorizes Commerce to Consider Evidence Regarding Circumvention

In a nonprecedential per curiam order issued Friday, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted the Department of Commerce a voluntary remand to consider evidence of potential fraud discovered subsequent to the completion of the 2008-09 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on shrimp from China. The Court rejected arguments from an exporter […]

Filed Under: International Trade, News Tagged With: antidumping, CAFC, Cambodia, China, CIT, import fraud, International Trade, seafood trade

March 25, 2013 by PKR

Kahn Publishes Article in Global Trade and Customs Journal

PKR attorney Jordan Kahn published an article in the April 2013 Global Trade and Customs Journal entitled “Commerce’s Commitment to Strengthening US Trade Remedy Laws. “The article describes PKR’s recent litigation achievements on behalf of the Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee before the Court of International Trade and Department of Commerce.

Filed Under: International Trade, News Tagged With: antidumping, Bangladesh, CAFC, Cambodia, CBP, China, CIT, countervailing duty, enforcement, import fraud, India, International Trade, labor, nonmarket economy, seafood trade, Thailand, Vietnam

January 9, 2013 by PKR

Court of International Trade Authorizes Commerce to Consider Evidence Regarding Circumvention

The Court of International Trade today issued a decision granting the government’s request to reopen an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on shrimp from China that was concluded in 2011. The Commerce Department now will consider evidence made public in 2012 that suggested transshipment through Cambodia to evade antidumping duties. This evidence was brought to […]

Filed Under: International Trade, News Tagged With: antidumping, Cambodia, China, CIT, import fraud, International Trade, seafood trade

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next Page »

Contact

Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP
1750 K Street NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: +1 202 331 4040
Fax: +1 202 331 4011
info@pkrllp.com

Recent Posts

  • After an Historic Year at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the Court’s Work Has Just Begun
  • Zachary J. Walker and Sophia Lin Named Counsel

Sitemap

PKR LLP Sitemap

© Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

The materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. If you have a particular problem or issue for which you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.