Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

  • Home
  • People
  • Practice Areas
    • International Trade
    • International Investment and Project Development
    • International Disputes/Rights & Obligations of Sovereign States & Autonomous Regions
    • U.S. & International Regulation and Legislation
    • Board Advisory Work
  • Global Experience
  • News/Blog
  • Contact Us

February 7, 2017 by Nathaniel Rickard

CIT Affirms Commerce’s Broad Discretion in Determining Whether a Domestic Company May Request an Administrative Review

On February 3, 2017, the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) upheld the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) finding that Dixon Ticonderoga Company (“Dixon”), as a U.S. producer of cased pencils, was entitled to request an administrative review of the entries of pencil imports shipped to the United States by a Chinese exporter, Shandong Rongxin […]

Filed Under: International Trade Tagged With: administrative review, antidumping, cased pencils, domestic producer, enforcement, International Trade

January 12, 2017 by Nathaniel Rickard

Customs Penalty Litigation Demonstrates How Evasion of Antidumping Duties Fundamentally Undermines Trade Remedy Law

In May 2015, all six commissioners of the U.S. International Trade Commission unanimously determined that the revocation of the antidumping duty order on imports of saccharin from China would not be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic saccharin industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission made […]

Filed Under: International Trade Tagged With: antidumping, CBP, enforcement, import fraud, International Trade, saccharin

January 10, 2017 by Brian McGill

Customs Initiates Formal Investigation Of Antidumping Duty Evasion And Applies Interim Measures Against Chinese Wire Hanger Imports Transshipped Through Thailand

In late December, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) began to publish notices respecting initiation of investigations against importers who were alleged to have evaded antidumping or countervailing duties. These investigations are conducted pursuant to new statutory authority commonly referred to as the Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA). While the results of CBP’s informal […]

Filed Under: International Trade Tagged With: antidumping, CBP, enforcement, import fraud, International Trade

January 10, 2017 by Brian McGill

Federal Circuit Affirms Commerce Authority to Address Fraud in Antidumping Proceedings

Authors: Brian McGill and Nathaniel Rickard.   In a decision upholding the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (Commerce) “considerable discretion” to determine the contents of the record in its administrative proceedings and to apply adverse facts available (AFA), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) on Friday affirmed the agency’s decision to reject, […]

Filed Under: International Trade Tagged With: antidumping, International Trade

August 26, 2016 by Nathaniel Rickard

Tools Are In Place to Improve Antidumping/Countervailing Duty Collections

In testimony before the Senate Finance Committee in June 2008 (treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/hp1051.aspx), the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Timothy E. Skud, summarized his agency’s findings regarding U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) collection of antidumping/countervailing duties as follows: Although CBP’s collection rate is over 99 […]

Filed Under: International Trade Tagged With: antidumping, cpb, enforcement, import fraud

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 16
  • Next Page »

Contact

Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP
1750 K Street NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: +1 202 331 4040
Fax: +1 202 331 4011
info@pkrllp.com

Recent Posts

  • Zachary J. Walker and Sophia Lin Named Counsel
  • Non-Resident Importers and Inadequate Bonding Leave Duties Unpaid, Harming the Public Fisc

Sitemap

PKR LLP Sitemap

© Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

The materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. If you have a particular problem or issue for which you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.