Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

  • People
  • Practice Areas
    • International Trade
    • International Investment and Project Development
    • International Disputes/Rights & Obligations of Sovereign States & Autonomous Regions
    • U.S. & International Regulation and Legislation
    • Board Advisory Work
  • Global Experience
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

March 19, 2014 by PKR

Commerce Assigns 25.76% Antidumping Margin to Vietnamese Shrimp Exporter; Reopens Record of Sunset Review Completed in 2010

The U.S. Department of Commerce today published its final results of the reconducted 2008-09 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on shrimp from Vietnam for the exporter Grobest & I-Mei Industrial (Vietnam) Co., Ltd. (“Grobest”).  Commerce in 2010 assigned Grobest a 3.92% rate based on the examination of other companies.  Grobest successfully challenged Commerce’s refusal to individually examine its sales data, with the Court of International Trade in 2012 ordering the exporter-specific reconduct.

Yet Grobest thereafter refused to participate in the review and insisted that Commerce terminate the proceeding.  This demand was opposed by the Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee (“AHSTAC”), an association of domestic producers of warmwater shrimp represented by PKR, who argued that the CIT ruling and other applicable legal requirements necessitated the review.  Commerce agreed with AHSTAC and, in response to the exporter’s non-cooperation, today applies statutory “adverse facts available” to assign Grobest the 25.76% margin.

Grobest’s refusal to participate occurred after the submission of evidence by AHSTAC suggesting that Vietnamese and Chinese shrimp was transshipped through Cambodia to evade duties by Grobest’s U.S. affiliate, Ocean Duke Corp.  This evidence led Commerce to find that Ocean Duke’s affiliate Hilltop International committed material misrepresentation by failing to disclose its Cambodian affiliate.  In result, Commerce assigned Hilltop a 112.81% rate in no less than four reviews of the AD order on shrimp from China and reversed a determination in a 2007 changed circumstances review.

Also today, Commerce noticed its intent to reopen the five-year “sunset” review of the AD order on shrimp from Vietnam that concluded in 2010.  Commerce describes AHSTAC’s evidence “suggesting the existence of a multi-year transnational scheme to avoid payment of duties on Vietnamese shrimp” and its “concern” that the record examined in the sunset may have been tainted by fraud.”  Comments on the reopened proceeding are due next month.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: International Trade, News Tagged With: antidumping, Cambodia, China, CIT, import fraud, International Trade, mushrooms, seafood trade, Vietnam

Contact

Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP
1750 K Street NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: +1 202 331 4040
Fax: +1 202 331 4011
info@pkrllp.com

Recent Posts

  • After an Historic Year at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the Court’s Work Has Just Begun
  • Zachary J. Walker and Sophia Lin Named Counsel

Sitemap

PKR LLP Sitemap

© Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

The materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. If you have a particular problem or issue for which you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.