Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

  • Home
  • People
  • Practice Areas
    • International Trade
    • International Investment and Project Development
    • International Disputes/Rights & Obligations of Sovereign States & Autonomous Regions
    • U.S. & International Regulation and Legislation
    • Board Advisory Work
  • Global Experience
  • News/Blog
  • Contact Us

April 20, 2013 by PKR

International Bribery: OECD Attacks Both Supply and Demand

In Early April Nicola Bonucci, Director for Legal Affairs of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), spoke at a World Bank conference that focused on the characteristics of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention that result in effective deterrence and enforcement. These include: mistrust among the Convention’s parties regarding their respective compliance; parties’ desire to see other countries criticized after they are criticized themselves; mandatory publishing of all Convention monitoring reports; and the adoption of reports through “consensus minus one”.

Some country-specific factors play a strong role, including: independence of judges and magistrates; the degree of national sentiment disapproving conduct revealed in an anti-bribery enforcement proceeding against a national champion company; the general effectiveness of the country’s justice system; and the degree to which prosecutors are free to aggressively pursue cases.

Impediments enforcing the Convention’s provisions in certain countries include: domestic resource constraints; uncertainty regarding when the relevant statutes of limitation begin to run; and domestic definitions of “public official.”

Mr. Bonucci and other participants cited evidence of continued progress in international anti-bribery efforts. Examples included the Siemens settlement with the Greek parliament regarding allegations of bribery during the 2008 Summer Olympics and the recent suspension by the World Bank of a loan to Bangladesh because of significant bribery concerns. Also noted was the considerable potential of the OECD’s informal mechanism for reporting government officials’ solicitation of bribes to strike at the “demand side” of bribery.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Foreign Investment, Incentives & Barriers Tagged With: Bribery

Contact

Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP
1750 K Street NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: +1 202 331 4040
Fax: +1 202 331 4011
info@pkrllp.com

Recent Posts

  • After an Historic Year at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the Court’s Work Has Just Begun
  • Zachary J. Walker and Sophia Lin Named Counsel

Sitemap

PKR LLP Sitemap

© Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

The materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. If you have a particular problem or issue for which you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.