Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

  • Home
  • People
  • Practice Areas
    • International Trade
    • International Investment and Project Development
    • International Disputes/Rights & Obligations of Sovereign States & Autonomous Regions
    • U.S. & International Regulation and Legislation
    • Board Advisory Work
  • Global Experience
  • News/Blog
  • Contact Us

April 14, 2014 by PKR

Gordon Quoted in Article Regarding Hearst Newspapers Investigation of Antidumping Duty Fraud

The San Francisco Chronicle today published an article reporting the results of a far-reaching Hearst Newspapers investigation into the fraudulent and illegal evasion of payment of antidumping duties on a variety of different products.

The article analyzes illegal evasion of trade remedies on four different groups of imported products:  fresh garlic, honey, glycine, and canned mushrooms.  Overall, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has reported to Congress that there has been a total of $1.79 billion in unpaid antidumping and countervailing duties.  Using specific examples, the article describes how manipulating the new shipper and administrative review process to obtain low cash deposit rates, as well as outright fraudulent misidentification of goods at entry, results in the illegal evasion of hundreds of millions of dollars in antidumping duties each year.

On the U.S. side of the import transactions,  “shell” companies act as the U.S. importers of record, but then disappear once bills come due.  Shipments from one Chinese exporter of canned mushrooms are likely to result in antidumping duty bills of “at least $100 million,” according to the article.  “But collecting will be difficult if not impossible” as at least five of the companies that purportedly acted as the importers of record have dissolved or cannot be located.

The fraud confronting federal agencies is sometimes committed by the same actors engaged in multiple transactions over time.  One CBP investigation found that a garlic exporter had misidentified the producer of the merchandise, as the packing codes used in the commercial sale documentation identified the source of the garlic as another producer “a company responsible for 255 unpaid duty bills amounting to $12 million,” according to the article.

Moreover, the fraudulent tactics used to evade payment of antidumping duties also are used to import merchandise known to be unsafe.  The article cites to the example of a convicted honey smuggler that has also imported shrimp contaminated with chloramphenicol, “a potent antibiotic unapproved for use in food products in the United States.”

Commenting on the schemes documented by the Hearst Newspapers investigation, Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP partner Adam Gordon called the fraud “typical of the kinds of schemes that we have seen” which left trade law practitioners “wondering how many haven’t been found yet.”

The article, along with the vast majority of independent investigations of trade fraud, underscores the severity of evasion and circumvention of trade remedies.  These schemes do not only violate the law; they cost the U.S. Treasury billions of dollars and do substantial damage to U.S. industries that have demonstrated material injury by reason of unfairly traded goods.

The full article is available here:  http://www.sfgate.com/nation/article/Illegal-Chinese-garlic-imports-pounding-U-S-5396865.php

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Customs, International Trade, News Tagged With: CBP, China, countervailing duty, garlic trade, honey trade, import fraud, International Trade, mushrooms

Contact

Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP
1750 K Street NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: +1 202 331 4040
Fax: +1 202 331 4011
info@pkrllp.com

Recent Posts

  • After an Historic Year at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the Court’s Work Has Just Begun
  • Zachary J. Walker and Sophia Lin Named Counsel

Sitemap

PKR LLP Sitemap

© Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

The materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. If you have a particular problem or issue for which you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.