Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

  • Home
  • People
  • Practice Areas
    • International Trade
    • International Investment and Project Development
    • International Disputes/Rights & Obligations of Sovereign States & Autonomous Regions
    • U.S. & International Regulation and Legislation
    • Board Advisory Work
  • Global Experience
  • News/Blog
  • Contact Us

January 28, 2021 by Nathaniel Rickard

After an Historic Year at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the Court’s Work Has Just Begun

When the American Manufacturers of Multilayered Wood Flooring filed an appeal at the U.S. Court of International Trade challenging the final results of a U.S. Department of Commerce antidumping administrative review, the case was docketed under the number 1:20-cv-3948. It was the final lawsuit filed in 2020 and capped off a remarkable year at the […]

Filed Under: International Law Tagged With: antidumping, countervailing duty, Imports, International Trade, trade

September 30, 2014 by B. Donovan Picard

State Sovereignty, Intervention, and International Law

There is probably no branch of international law which is so calculated to encourage the skeptic as that mass of contradictory precedents, dogmatic assertions, and vague principles which are collected under the common head of “intervention,” and perhaps there is no more potentially dangerous ground of intervention than that which is variously described as” self-preservation” […]

Filed Under: International Disputes/Dimensions of Sovereignty, International Law Tagged With: International Law, intervention, sovereignty

October 29, 2013 by PKR

CAFC Dissent Makes Case for Increased Deference to CIT

Last week the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an order denying a petition for en banc reconsideration of its decision in NSK Corp. v. United States.  In that case, the CAFC reversed the U.S. Court of International Trade on the issue of whether the U.S. International Trade Commission properly assessed injury […]

Filed Under: International Law Tagged With: antidumping, CAFC, CIT, countervailing duty, International Trade, ITC, SCOTUS

October 22, 2013 by PKR

ITC Votes to Expedite Sunset Review of Nails from China

The U.S. International Trade Commission yesterday unanimously voted to expedite its review of the antidumping duty order on steel nails from the People’s Republic of China.  This “sunset” review covering the five-year span of 2008 to 2013 will determine whether maintaining the order is warranted. The ITC voted to conduct this procedure without briefing or a […]

Filed Under: International Law, International Trade, News Tagged With: antidumping, China, International Trade, ITC, nails trade

October 18, 2013 by PKR

Arbitrary jurisdiction decisions exacerbate the ICC’s Africa problem

While Libya’s post-revolution central government struggles to exert control over a restive populace and get the fractured nation’s economy back on track, it has also been fighting a legal battle against the International Court of Justice over the right to try members of the late Muamar Gaddafi’s regime in Libyan courts. The two men in […]

Filed Under: International Disputes/Dimensions of Sovereignty, International Law Tagged With: ICC, Libya, war crimes

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next Page »

Contact

Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP
1750 K Street NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: +1 202 331 4040
Fax: +1 202 331 4011
info@pkrllp.com

Recent Posts

  • After an Historic Year at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the Court’s Work Has Just Begun
  • Zachary J. Walker and Sophia Lin Named Counsel

Sitemap

PKR LLP Sitemap

© Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

The materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. If you have a particular problem or issue for which you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.