Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

  • People
  • Practice Areas
    • International Trade
    • International Investment and Project Development
    • International Disputes/Rights & Obligations of Sovereign States & Autonomous Regions
    • U.S. & International Regulation and Legislation
    • Board Advisory Work
    • Public Interest and Charitable Activities
  • Global Experience
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

October 21, 2020 by Zachary Walker

Importers Team Up to Undercut Regulations Designed to Improve Enforcement of U.S. Trade Remedy Laws

This August, the Department of Commerce published in the Federal Register notice of proposed Regulations To Improve Administration and Enforcement of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Laws. The changes proposed by Commerce to the AD/CVD regulations represent the largest such amendment to the agency’s regulations in twenty years. These proposed modifications of Commerce’s existing AD/CVD regulations […]

Filed Under: Antidumping, Enforcement, Import Fraud, International Trade Tagged With: antidumping, countervailing duty, enforcement, import fraud, International Trade, trade

April 24, 2020 by Nathaniel Rickard

Congress Requires CBP to Issue a Detailed Public Report of Its Antidumping/Countervailing Duty Collection Efforts; CBP’s Ignoring Congress

In an October 2019 report, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Collection of Outstanding Claims, prepared for Congress by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”), the agency explained that at the close of fiscal year 2019 there were 64,761 open bills for antidumping and countervailing duties, with a total amount outstanding of US$4.472 billion. These figures represented […]

Filed Under: Antidumping, CBP, Enforcement, Import Fraud, International Trade Tagged With: antidumping, CBP, enforcement, import fraud, International Trade

April 13, 2018 by Nathaniel Rickard

Court of International Trade Hobbles an Essential Enforcement Tool

As U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) endeavors to improve enforcement of U.S. trade laws, the option of imposing a single entry bond (“SEB”) requirement on certain types of shipments (or with respect to certain importers) has become much more important. CBP’s enforcement initiatives are, by necessity, largely retrospective in nature. When the agency suspects […]

Filed Under: Antidumping, CBP, Enforcement, Import Fraud, International Trade Tagged With: Single Entry Bond

April 4, 2018 by Whitney Rolig

Section 232 Steel Product Exclusion Process Will Be Determined by Participation of U.S. Steel Mills

Following its investigation of the effects of steel imports on national security, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (Commerce) recommended that the Administration take action to limit those imports such that, when combined with “good management,” it would “enable U.S. steel mills to operate at 80 percent or more of their […]

Filed Under: Aluminum, CBP, Domestic Producer, Enforcement, International Trade, Product Exclusion, Section 232, Steel

September 27, 2017 by Nathaniel Rickard

In First Year of Existence, CBP’s EAPA Proceedings Provides Meaningful, Timely Remedies to Circumvention

The Enforce and Protect Act of 2015, Section 421 (EAPA) established an administrative process through which trade-affected domestic industries could petition U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to take action against unfairly traded imports that were entered into the United States so as to fraudulently evade antidumping and/or countervailing duties. Under the legislation, EAPA proceedings […]

Filed Under: Antidumping, CBP, EAPA, Enforcement, Import Fraud, International Trade

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page »

Contact

Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP
1750 K Street NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: +1 202 331 4040
Fax: +1 202 331 4011
info@pkrllp.com

Recent Posts

  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection Reports Record Amounts of Imports Subject to Antidumping and Countervailing Duties in FY2021
  • Number of U.S. Industries Filing Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions Decreases Significantly in Fiscal Year 2021

Sitemap

PKR LLP Sitemap

© Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

The materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. If you have a particular problem or issue for which you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.