Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

  • Home
  • People
  • Practice Areas
    • International Trade
    • International Investment and Project Development
    • International Disputes/Rights & Obligations of Sovereign States & Autonomous Regions
    • U.S. & International Regulation and Legislation
    • Board Advisory Work
  • Global Experience
  • News/Blog
  • Contact Us

January 28, 2015 by PKR

Cyprus gas prospects threatened by Turkey

The Republic of Cyprus (RoC) has begun talks with US-based Noble Energy regarding the exploitation of an offshore gas field. The Aphrodite field lies near Cyprus’ maritime border with Israel; Noble is also developing the Leviathan field on Israel’s side of the line. But for Cyprus, developing its underwater resources is proving more difficult than it appears on the surface.

Since it first began issuing offshore exploration licenses last decade, the RoC government has come under pressure from Turkey and the Turkish-backed breakaway government in northern Cyprus, both of which claim rights to Cypriot waters. The RoC has been proactive and diligent in establishing its maritime boundaries in accordance with the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), signing bilateral border agreements and cross-border development agreements with its neighbors Egypt, Israel, and Lebanon (though Lebanon has not yet ratified the latter). But Turkey and its client state the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) are not party to UNCLOS, and have thus far refused to recognize the legitimacy of Cyprus’ borders.

According to Turkey’s own interpretation of maritime law, island states cannot claim maritime zones that conflict with or limit the rights of coastal states. Turkey’s arbitrarily- and unilaterally-determined Mediterranean border with Egypt overlaps with several of the blocs Cyprus has opened to exploration. Meanwhile, the TRNC government (recognized only by Turkey) has long held that RoC has no right to develop resources without TRNC’s approval and participation.

Seeking to force the issue, TRNC has recently demarcated its own exploration blocs—which overlap substantially with RoC’s—and issued exploration licenses to the Turkish national petroleum company. In an effort to intimidate RoC and its foreign partners, Turkey has repeatedly sent survey vessels into Cypriot waters accompanied by warships. The Turkish petroleum company has also started an onshore drilling operation in the Turkish-controlled north of the island.

Since the 1970s, the United Nations has worked to resolve the conflict between the RoC and TRNC. Meanwhile, the international community has almost unanimously supported RoC’s right to develop the country’s resources. For its part, RoC’s government has tried to use the issue of resource development to encourage a peaceful, permanent settlement with the Turkish north, and has made repeated assurances that under a comprehensive, federal reunification, both sides of the island would benefit equally from gas and oil exploitation. Unfortunately for all parties involved, the provocative actions of Turkey and TRNC stand in the way of Cyprus’ best chance of a prosperous future.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Blog, Boundary Disputes, International Disputes/Dimensions of Sovereignty Tagged With: Cyprus, Gas, Turkey

Contact

Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP
1750 K Street NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: +1 202 331 4040
Fax: +1 202 331 4011
info@pkrllp.com

Recent Posts

  • After an Historic Year at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the Court’s Work Has Just Begun
  • Zachary J. Walker and Sophia Lin Named Counsel

Sitemap

PKR LLP Sitemap

© Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

The materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. If you have a particular problem or issue for which you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.