Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

  • People
  • Practice Areas
    • International Trade
    • International Investment and Project Development
    • International Disputes/Rights & Obligations of Sovereign States & Autonomous Regions
    • U.S. & International Regulation and Legislation
    • Board Advisory Work
    • Public Interest and Charitable Activities
  • Global Experience
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

January 13, 2015 by PKR

ICSID claims against Spain mount, while private citizens take the state to court

A group of German and Spanish companies with interests in Europe’s largest solar power plant have filed a claim against Spain at ICSID under the terms of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). The case is ICSID’s first new filing of 2015, but hardly the first such challenge for the Spanish government. Spain is already the respondent in eight other ECT claims before ICSID. Like the latest one, these suits have to do with a set of recently-adopted reforms governing Spain’s renewable energy sector.

Last decade, Spain passed a clean energy law that offered solar energy producers “58 cents for each kilowatt-hour for the next 25 years and guaranteed 80 percent of that for the years thereafter.” The rates brought small-time investors flooding into the market, and attracted big energy players to Spain as well. But the government reportedly failed to pass the true costs of solar generation onto consumers. Now, facing a $40 billion deficit in the energy sector, Spain has done away with that guaranteed rate, and drastically cut solar subsidies.

According to the government, the new measures are crucial to the state’s economic survival.

“The measures have three main objectives: grant stability to the system, guarantee reasonable returns on investment and provide certainty to the industry,” Industry Minister Jose Manuel Soria said in a press conference in Madrid today. Renewable energy subsidies had to be revised or the power system would have gone bankrupt, he said.

Soria said Spain has already paid about 56 billion euros ($76.5 billion) to clean energy generators since 1998 and will pay another 142 billion euros over their lifetimes. The subsidies, including those for co-generation, totaled 9 billion euros last year.

But major energy players say the new measures, which will apply retroactively as well, will have a disastrous effect on current and future investment.

The retroactive measures have angered the renewable energy industry, which says the government has acted illegally and will bankrupt many projects. The Asociacion de Productores de Energias Renovables, a lobby group, in February estimated they would cut more than 2,000 million euros in revenue for generators. In April, the government’s new regulator CNMC said they would cut revenue by 1,700 million euros this year.

Acciona SA (ANA), Spain’s largest wind operator after Iberdrola SA (IBE), said the decree is retroactive and will destroy the value of the company’s renewable energy investments in Spain. The company said in an e-mail it will challenge the rules in Spain’s Supreme Court.

Hence the proliferation of claims pending against Spain before ICSID. The Energy Charter Treaty, to which Spain is a party, gives foreign investors the choice of pursuing disputes before local courts, contract-specified resolution mechanisms, or international arbitration. Most, if not all, of Spain’s solar investors are taking the third option. Meanwhile, well over a thousand small-scale investors and solar producers, including many private citizens who sunk their savings into backyard solar farms, are bringing suits in the Spanish courts. The outcome of these disputes will likely affect not only the future of renewable energy in Spain, but the wider climate of foreign investment as well.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Arbitration, Blog, Disputes & Agreements, Foreign Investment, Incentives & Barriers Tagged With: ICSID, Renewable energy, Spain

Contact

Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP
1750 K Street NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: +1 202 331 4040
Fax: +1 202 331 4011
info@pkrllp.com

Recent Posts

  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection Reports Record Amounts of Imports Subject to Antidumping and Countervailing Duties in FY2021
  • Number of U.S. Industries Filing Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions Decreases Significantly in Fiscal Year 2021

Sitemap

PKR LLP Sitemap

© Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

The materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. If you have a particular problem or issue for which you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.