Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

  • People
  • Practice Areas
    • International Trade
    • International Investment and Project Development
    • International Disputes/Rights & Obligations of Sovereign States & Autonomous Regions
    • U.S. & International Regulation and Legislation
    • Board Advisory Work
    • Public Interest and Charitable Activities
  • Global Experience
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Archives for June 2015

June 24, 2015 by PKR

Federal Circuit Affirms Surety Liability for Antidumping Duties on Crawfish from China

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit last week affirmed the U.S. Court of International Trade’s finding that American Home Assurance Company (AHAC) is liable for antidumping duties under a bond issued for crawfish tail meat imported from China in 2001.  The crawfish entered without any declared antidumping duty liability because the exporter was a […]

Filed Under: Customs, International Trade Tagged With: antidumping, CAFC, China, CIT, International Trade, seafood trade, surety

June 17, 2015 by Nathaniel Rickard

Court of International Trade Upholds Single Transaction Bond Requirement on Imports of Garlic from China

The U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) has upheld a negative bond sufficiency determination by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) regarding certain entries of fresh garlic from China imported by Kwo Lee Inc. The fresh garlic was exported by Qingdao Tiantaixing Foods Co., Ltd. (“QTF”), a company that had obtained an antidumping duty cash […]

Filed Under: Customs, International Trade Tagged With: antidumping, CBP, garlic trade, import fraud, International Trade

June 16, 2015 by PKR

Mid Continent Steel & Wire Commends U.S. International Trade Commission’s Determination Clearing the Way for Duties on Steel Nails from Korea, Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan and Vietnam

Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc., the largest U.S. producer of steel nails, today commended the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) for its final affirmative determination that the U.S. steel nail industry has been materially injured by unfairly-priced and subsidized imports from Korea, Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan and Vietnam. Today’s vote by the ITC clears the way for the […]

Filed Under: International Trade, News Tagged With: antidumping, CBP, China, countervailing duty, International Trade, ITC, Korea, Malaysia, nails trade, Oman, Taiwan, UAE, Vietnam

June 5, 2015 by PKR

Court of International Trade Remands Surrogate Country Selection in Antidumping Duty Review of Shrimp from China

The Court of International Trade today issued a remand for the Commerce Department to reconsider the surrogate market economy data used to evaluate the Chinese exporter Zhanjiang Regal Integrated Marine Resources during the fifth administrative review period (2009-10) for the antidumping duty order on shrimp from China, a nonmarket economy. Picard Kentz & Rowe brought the […]

Filed Under: International Trade, News Tagged With: antidumping, China, CIT, India, International Trade, nonmarket economy, seafood trade, Thailand

Contact

Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP
1750 K Street NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: +1 202 331 4040
Fax: +1 202 331 4011
info@pkrllp.com

Recent Posts

  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection Reports Record Amounts of Imports Subject to Antidumping and Countervailing Duties in FY2021
  • Number of U.S. Industries Filing Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions Decreases Significantly in Fiscal Year 2021

Sitemap

PKR LLP Sitemap

© Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

The materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. If you have a particular problem or issue for which you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.