Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

  • Home
  • People
  • Practice Areas
    • International Trade
    • International Investment and Project Development
    • International Disputes/Rights & Obligations of Sovereign States & Autonomous Regions
    • U.S. & International Regulation and Legislation
    • Board Advisory Work
  • Global Experience
  • News/Blog
  • Contact Us

November 29, 2018 by Nathaniel Rickard

Uncollected Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Exceed $3 Billion in FY2017

U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 Report to Congress, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Enforcement Actions and Compliance Initiatives: FY 2017, has now been publicly released by the Department of Homeland Security. The report confirms that the antidumping and countervailing duty laws have become increasingly important for American industries, with antidumping and countervailing […]

Filed Under: International Trade Tagged With: antidumping, CBP, enforcement, import fraud, International Trade

November 28, 2018 by Nathaniel Rickard

Court of International Trade Rejects Importer’s Efforts to Collaterally Challenge Application of China Countrywide Antidumping Duty Rate

In Northern Tool & Equipment Company, Inc. v. United States, an importer (Northern Tool) challenged U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) assessment of a 383.6 percent antidumping duty assessment rate on eight entries of hand trucks from the People’s Republic of China brought into the United States between December 2007 and June 2008. Northern Tool […]

Filed Under: International Trade Tagged With: antidumping, CBP, enforcement, import fraud, International Trade

April 13, 2018 by Nathaniel Rickard

Court of International Trade Hobbles an Essential Enforcement Tool

As U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) endeavors to improve enforcement of U.S. trade laws, the option of imposing a single entry bond (“SEB”) requirement on certain types of shipments (or with respect to certain importers) has become much more important. CBP’s enforcement initiatives are, by necessity, largely retrospective in nature. When the agency suspects […]

Filed Under: Antidumping, CBP, Enforcement, Import Fraud, International Trade Tagged With: Single Entry Bond

September 27, 2017 by Nathaniel Rickard

In First Year of Existence, CBP’s EAPA Proceedings Provides Meaningful, Timely Remedies to Circumvention

The Enforce and Protect Act of 2015, Section 421 (EAPA) established an administrative process through which trade-affected domestic industries could petition U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to take action against unfairly traded imports that were entered into the United States so as to fraudulently evade antidumping and/or countervailing duties. Under the legislation, EAPA proceedings […]

Filed Under: Antidumping, CBP, EAPA, Enforcement, Import Fraud, International Trade

September 7, 2017 by Nathaniel Rickard

CBP’s EAPA Publications Shed Light on How the Agency Will Exercise Discretion in Administrative Proceedings

On August 17th, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) made public several documents related to investigations undertaken under the Enforce and Protect Act of 2015, Section 421 (EAPA). The public release of documents was accompanied by a press release heralding the agency’s exercise of authority to launch multiple investigations of illegal Chinese imports. The substance […]

Filed Under: Antidumping, CBP, EAPA, Enforcement, Import Fraud, International Trade

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next Page »

Contact

Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP
1750 K Street NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: +1 202 331 4040
Fax: +1 202 331 4011
info@pkrllp.com

Recent Posts

  • Uncollected Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Exceed $3 Billion in FY2017
  • Court of International Trade Rejects Importer’s Efforts to Collaterally Challenge Application of China Countrywide Antidumping Duty Rate

Sitemap

PKR LLP Sitemap

© Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP

The materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. If you have a particular problem or issue for which you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Use of and access to this Web site or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.